ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the effects of "two-classroom" teaching mode of basic life support (BLS) training on medical staffs. Methods One hundred and ninety-nine medical staffs trained in BLS curriculum education from May to August 2018 were selected as the research subjects. They were divided into two groups according to random number table: "two-classroom" teaching mode group (102) and traditional teaching mode group (97). The medical staffs in the traditional teaching mode group were trained by the traditional mode, while those in the"two-classroom" teaching mode group were trained by the "two-classroom" teaching mode, including the first and second classes; the first class is in-class teaching, using the Chinese version of the original American Heart Association (AHA) textbook, whose contents included basic life support operation video observation, practical operation, scene simulation and other teaching modes to carry out classroom teaching, and the second class was mainly in the extracurricular scene simulation. After the training, the differences in teaching effects regarding theoretical knowledge test scores and operational skills test scores and the degrees of satisfaction between the two groups were compared. Results The theoretical and operational scores of the "two-classroom" teaching mode group were significantly higher than those of the traditional teaching mode group (theoretical scores: 92.10±2.40 vs. 83.4±2.5, operational scores: 91.10±2.20 vs. 82.23±2.13, both P < 0.05). The degree of satisfaction with the BLS training (including 5 parts: controllable learning time, good interaction, cooperative communication, autonomous learning ability, achieving teaching goals) in the medical staffs in the "two-classroom" teaching mode group were higher than those in the traditional teaching mode group (controllable learning time: 98.04±6.35 vs. 83.51±5.27, good interaction: 97.06±6.12 vs. 83.51±5.33, cooperative communication: 96.08±6.07 vs. 73.20±4.96, autonomous learning ability: 96.08±6.15 vs. 73.20±4.28 and achieving teaching goals: 98.04±6.27 vs. 79.38±4.62, all P < 0.05). Conclusion The "two-classroom" teaching mode is a scientific, practical, simple and convenient teaching method, which can improve the theoretical and operational performance grades of trainees, and the medical staffs are well satisfied with the "two-classroom" teaching mode of BLS.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To identify and assess the potential public health risks of emergency events of infectious disease in the surrounding areas of Hangzhou during the 11th G20 summit, and to assess their impacts on the G20 summit.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The surrounding cities of Hangzhou included Ningbo, Wenzhou, Jiaxing, Huzhou, Shaoxing, Jinhua, Quzhou, Zhoushan, Taizhou and Lishui. Background information on infectious diseases in Zhejiang province was collected, and the brainstorming and expert consultation methods were used to identify the risks. The local risks and the impact of local risks on the G20 summit were assessed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The criteria for public health risk was first established. Through the assessments,a total of 27 kinds of infectious diseases in 4 types of public health risks were identified. The impact of these risks on Hangzhou G20 summit was divided into 1 item of high-risk, 12 items of medium risk and 14 items of low risk.According to the results of risk assessment, the recommendations for risk management of respiratory infectious diseases, intestinal infectious diseases, imported infectious diseases like Middle East respiratory syndrome and other infectious diseases were made. With risk management, Middle East respiratory syndrome was not occurred during the G20 summit, and the epidemic situation of other infectious diseases with middle or low risks was almost the same with that of past years.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>sThe public health risks of Hangzhou G20 summit from sudden infectious diseases in outlying areas are mainly medium and low risks. The recommendations on risk management provide a basis for reducing the adverse consequences of public health risks in the event of an outbreak of infectious diseases, avoiding the impact of various risk factors in the outlying areas on G20 summit.</p>
Subject(s)
Humans , Communicable Diseases , Emergency Medical Services , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
Background: Bariatric surgery is seen as one of the most successful option for the control of morbid obesity and obesity related complications. Although, there are many surgical options available the Lincey Alexida, Xiaohua Qi, Patrick B. Asdell, José M. Martínez Landrón, Samarth B. Patel, Faustino Allongo. Frederick Tiesenga. Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band as a Revision Surgery for Failed Vertical Gastric Sleeve or Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. IAIM, 2017; 4(12): 37-42. Page 38 laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy and the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass are among the most selected treatment methods. Even though the sleeve gastrectomy and the gastric bypass has proven to be efficacious in weight reduction in morbid obesity there are still some reported failures. Aim: This study main objective is to see if an adjustable gastric band can be offered as a sensible option for patients who have had a previously failed vertical sleeve gastrectomy or the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. The procedure will be classified as a revision surgery to increase the possibilities of additional weight loss not achieved with the sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass surgery alone. Method: A retrospective review of the charts for all the bariatric patients from April 2012 to April 2017 was conducted. The chart review yielded 12 patients who underwent either adjustable band over a previously failed vertical sleeve procedure or the adjustable band over a previously failed Roux-enY gastric bypass procedure. The patients were divided into two groups, group A and B. Group A is comprised of the 8 out 12 patients who had a previous failed gastric sleeve procedure. Group B has the remaining 4 patients who had a failed gastric bypass procedure. Observation: Both groups who underwent adjustable gastric band laparoscopically as a revision procedure after a two year follow up appointment showed Group A had a mean estimate weight loss of 30.75 lbs. (11%) with a mean Body Mass Index of 40.7 kg/m2 and Group B had a mean estimate weight loss of 42 lbs. (15%) with a mean Body Mass Index of 36.77 kg/m2 . Group A had an Excess Body Weight Loss of 27% at 1 month and 33% at the 2 year follow up and Group B had an Excess Body Weight Loss of 42.2%. Group B had an Excess Body Weight Loss of 15.1 % at 1 month and 42.2% at the 2 year follow up. Conclusion: Group A had an average of 27% Excess Body Weight Loss and Group B had an Excess Body Weight Loss of 15.1% after 1 month on follow up. Our study was limited by the small sample size. We suggest that further investigational studies, with greater and more diverse sample sizes, be conducted to assure the benefit of using the adjustable gastric band as a revision surgery. Based on our results we conclude that the adjustable gastric band as a revision surgery is a promising and sensible alternative treatment option for patients with a previously failed laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy or a failed Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.